SAP MM certification C_TS452 exam review: three trips into the practice kitchen

A complete review of passing the SAP MM certification (C_TS452): three attempts, the exam structure, why I failed, handling an exam system defect, and how I prepared to pass.

Hi, this is Rabbit! 🐰

A kitchen feels different the first time you walk in and the third time. You start to see what to take out first and where to taste along the way.

I passed the SAP MM certification C_TS452 on my third attempt. Since it is a hands-on exam where you complete tasks in a real system, there was quite a gap between knowing the material and executing it exactly in the exam room. This post pulls the three-part series together in one place.

Three-line summary

  • C_TS452 is a hands-on (SyBA) certification for S/4HANA sourcing and procurement, graded only on whether saved values match the instructions.
  • I failed the first attempt because of machine-translated instructions and no check before saving, and the second because of an exam system defect.
  • On the third attempt, English instructions, checks before and after saving, and a final full review got me a pass.

Three exam attempts

Three SAP MM certification C_TS452 attempts: first failed (machine translation, no time, no check before saving), second hit an exam system defect and the attempt was reissued (evidence collected, case filed with the Help Center), third passed (English instructions, checks around saves, final review) Figure 1. Three exam attempts. The exam version was C_TS452_2601, and the pass mark was 76%.

Series contents

  1. Exam structure and preparation: what C_TS452 covers, how to get eligibility and a practice system through Learning Hub, how the hands-on SyBA exam works, and why a PP practitioner started with MM
  2. First and second attempts failed: machine-translated instructions and time allocation, the trap of not checking before saving, and how I filed a support case after an exam system defect and got the attempt back
  3. Practice and passing: how I practiced with English course material, where mistakes tend to happen in a hands-on exam, exam-day order and time allocation, and Stay Certified

What three attempts left me with

  • Execution decides the score, not knowledge. I missed the first attempt not because I didn’t know, but because I didn’t check against the instructions before saving.
  • Read the instructions in English. The Korean instructions are machine-translated, and some numbers and structure read differently from the original.
  • Check before and after saving. Later tasks use the output of earlier ones, so one mistake spreads across several tasks.
  • If the system misbehaves, keep evidence. If it is a defect that is not the candidate’s fault, a support case can get your attempt back.

Rabbit’s Takeaway

Across three trips into the kitchen, what changed most was not how much I knew. It was how I read the recipe and the habit of checking before the plate went out. A hands-on exam scores you on what you executed by the instructions, not on how much you know. I hope this record serves as a small map for anyone preparing for the same exam 😎


Read more